The U.S. economy is hurtling
toward a recession if Congress fails to avert a series of tax hikes and budget
cuts due in January, the Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday, warning
that a fiscal impasse would have consequences even more dire than previously
forecast.
The CBO’s gloom sparked another round of political finger-pointing but
failed to cast much of a shadow over financial markets. That’s because the
Federal Reserve is inclined to act “fairly soon” to boost the slow pace of
economic recovery, according to minutes the central bank released Wednesday.
Moreover, new data showed signs of modest improvement in the housing market.
All of which raises a quandary for some economists: If Congress is
about to steer the nation over what is being widely dubbed a “fiscal cliff” by
failing to agree on a budget, then maybe the Fed should save its ammunition.
Let things get really bad, then act.
“Why do you want to waste your ammo
now if you’re going to go off a fiscal cliff at the beginning of next year?”
said Edward Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, urging restraint by the
Fed. By revving up the economy before it reaches the cliff, Yardeni said,
“maybe [the Fed] thinks we can do an Evel Knievel and jump right over it. But I
don’t get the logic of that.”
But the Fed minutes indicated that most of the members of its Open
Market Committee think otherwise.
“Many members judged that
additional monetary accommodation would likely be warranted fairly soon unless
incoming information pointed to a substantial and sustainable strengthening in
the pace of the economic recovery,” said the minutes of the meeting held July
31 and Aug. 1.
The Fed debated a variety of tools for boosting growth, including
extending its current commitment to ultra-low federal funds rates past 2014,
linking those rates to economic indicators, launching a new round of purchases
of Treasury and mortgage securities and initiating a scheme to encourage bank
lending.
With just 21 / 2 months left until the presidential election, it may be
too late for monetary or fiscal policy to significantly alter the state of the
economy before voters head to the polls. But actions taken now by the Fed or
Congress might still influence whether voters believe the economy is on the
right track.
A steep cliff might not look like the right direction, though, and the
CBO said businesses might delay hiring or investment if the outlook is
threatening.
In its report Wednesday, the CBO warned that the nation would be
plunged into a significant recession during the first half of next year if
Congress fails to avert nearly $500 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts set
to hit in January.
The massive round of New Year’s belt-tightening — known as the “fiscal
cliff” or “Taxmageddon” — would disrupt recent economic progress, push the
unemployment rate back up to 9.1 percent by the end of 2013 and produce
economic conditions “that will probably be considered a recession,” the
nonpartisan CBO said.
The CBO’s economic outlook is considerably darker than the forecast the
agency released in January, when it predicted that the fiscal cliff would
trigger a mild recession in the first half of 2013, with the economy shrinking
by 1.3 percent. Now the agency foresees a stronger contraction of 2.9 percent
in gross domestic product, “similar in magnitude to the recession of the early
1990s.”
Republicans, including presidential candidate Mitt Romney, want to
postpone the biggest chunk of the cliff — $331 billion in tax hikes — to give
Congress time to overhaul the tax code.
They have also sought to pin the scheduled deep cut in military
spending on President Obama, working to undercut his support in electoral
battlegrounds where defense spending is key to the economy. The Republican-led
House passed legislation in the spring that would shift those defense cuts onto
domestic programs.
Democrats, including the president, want to avert tax hikes for those
making less than $250,000 a year but say they will not avert tax increases for
those making more, arguing that higher tax revenues are needed to help close
deficits.
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said the report underscores why
the House in August passed legislation to avoid tax increases for Americans at
all income levels. The Democratic-led Senate passed a competing bill to halt tax
increases only on income less than $250,000.
“Instead of threatening to drive us
off the fiscal cliff and tank our economy in their quest for higher taxes, I
would urge President Obama and congressional Democrats to work with us to stop
the coming tax hike that threatens our economy and replace the looming defense
cuts with common sense reforms,” Boehner said in a statement.
The White House turned the tables, responding in a statement that the
report “only reinforces the urgent need for House Republicans to follow the
Senate’s lead and pass a bill that gives middle-class families the confidence
that they won’t see their taxes go up at the beginning of next year.”
The CBO report is gloomier than the agency’s January forecast in part
because of a decision by Congress to steepen the fiscal cliff by extending a
temporary payroll tax break and emergency unemployment benefits, which are now
also set to expire in January.
In addition, CBO analysts have concluded that the underlying economy is
weaker than previously predicted.
“The magnitude of the slowdown
we’re discussing next year is significant,” CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf said
at a morning briefing. He noted that going over the cliff could cost the nation
about 2 million jobs. Elmendorf said the unemployment rate could remain stuck
above 8 percent through 2014.
The agency says growth would be weaker than previously forecast, with
the economy expanding by an annualized rate of just 1.9 percent in the second
half of 2013.
Even without a year-end fiscal crisis, the Fed “anticipates a very
gradual pickup in economic activity over time and a slow decline in
unemployment,” with low inflation, according to the central bank’s minutes.
But the Fed members confessed “an unusually high level of uncertainty”
about the outlook, noting that Europe’s sovereign-debt and banking crisis and
the specter of “a sharper-than-anticipated fiscal contraction in the United
States” meant that expectations were “tilted to the downside.”
Republicans have been increasingly vocal about their desire to avert
the $55 billion in planned reductions at the Defense Department in January. In
Tampa this week, a drafting committee inserted language into the party’s
official platform calling the defense cut “a disaster for national security”
and blaming Obama for its creation.
The platform does not address the equally stark $55 billion
across-the-board cut scheduled to hit domestic programs or offer guidance on
how to avert the cuts without worsening the deficits.
While the CBO report outlines the consequences to the economy of
failing to reach a deal to avert the cuts and tax increases, it also
demonstrates the flip side of continued gridlock: one of the biggest rounds of
deficit reduction in modern history.
If Congress does nothing and allows taxes to rise and spending to fall,
the CBO predicts the 2013 deficit would plummet to $641 billion instead of
exceeding $1 trillion for a fifth straight year.
For the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, the CBO predicts the
deficit will be just over $1.1 trillion, down slightly from previous
projections, thanks to better-than-expected tax collections and lower spending
as the war in Iraq ends and the effects of the 2009 economic stimulus wane.
The national debt is nonetheless growing apace, with debt owed to
outside investors set to hit 73 percent of the overall economy by the end of
September. That’s the highest level in more than 60 years and nearly double the
level in 2007, before the onset of the recent recession.
No comments:
Post a Comment